This is the 3rd post in a series on rapid changes in race/ethnicity.
The first two compared Detroit to Houston, with the first post mapping where the changes occurred, and the second post putting some specific numbers on how much things changed.
For this blog, I'll be focusing on how current changes in metro Detroit compare to earlier decades.
I've defined "rapid" as a change of more than 20 percentage points, and focused only on situations where the white population decreased and visible minorities decreased.
So for example, a census tract that was 70% white in 2000 would have to be 50% white or less in 2010 to qualify.
For a refresher, here's what the situation was for the 2000-2010 period.
Areas in blue show census tracts where the fastest growing minority was blacks, orange is for Hispanics and red is for Asians. The table adds up the total populations for all areas where blacks grew fast, all areas where Hispanics grew fastest, and all areas where Asians grew fastest, and then the total of all the census tracts where the white population share decreased by 20+ percentage points.
Move on to the 80s, the 1980 census used "Persons of Spanish Origin" instead of Hispanics. I'm assuming they're more or less equivalent, in which case blacks made up the bulk of the minority share in all areas where it increased by over 20 percentage points:
The changes were mostly affecting outer neighbourhoods of Detroit, although a few of the outermost neighbourhoods weren't too affected yet. Outside Detroit, they mostly affected Southfield/Oak Park.
The numbers are somewhat similar to what they were in the 90s in terms of total population affected, although the 90s saw other ethnic groups play a bigger role, so the 80s had more neighbourhoods transitioning from white to black than the 90s. The changes were a bit faster too, and the areas affected lost a bit of population.
The 70s are tricky again. For the 80s onwards, the census distinguished between Hispanics of the various races. In the 1970 census however, it only states how many people of Spanish origin there are without stating the race of people of Spanish origin, and instead of giving the number of Non-Hispanic whites it gives one number for all whites (Hispanic/Spanish or not).
In most of Metro Detroit there's very few people of Spanish origin so it doesn't matter, but in SW Detroit there are already some. It seems like most of the people of Spanish origin moving in to this area listed their race as "other" though (ie not white) so I could still use that.
The main thing though is that the population of neighbourhoods rapidly transitioning from white to black is considerably greater than in the 80s and 90s, and more than 3 times greater than in the 00s. The number of whites also decreased by 45 percentage points in these neighbourhoods vs 25 percentage points in the 00s, so we're talking about a decrease of 325,000 whites in these neighbourhoods as opposed to a decrease of only 54,000 whites for the 00s.
And actually the situation in the 70s was probably even worse than it looks from these numbers. For example, many of these neighbourhoods were probably 99% white in 1970, and might have still been 98% white in 1975 and then dropped to 55% white by 1980. Or maybe it was already only 50% white in 1970, and then dropped to 10% white by 1975 and 3% white in 1980. Basically, because of how fast these neighbourhoods were changing, a decade is too long of a time scale.
For evidence of this, here's how much the % white changed in some census tracts in NW Detroit around Greenfield Rd/Southfield Fwy. Neighbourhoods west of these census tracts changed more slowly, probably because white flight (and I think with this rate of change it's safe to say that's what it is) only started in those neighbourhoods in the mid-late 70s. Neighbourhoods to the east of these census tracts changed more slowly because they had fewer whites to lose.
This is the part of NW Detroit (around Livernois to Meyers) that experienced the most intense white flight, again, a similar pattern to the 70s, just closer to the core.
For people who say white flight only began after the 1967 riots, it might be a bit tricky to explain this data.
You'd have to explain:
-Why was white flight so intense in some areas (100% white to 12% white in the most extreme case) while other areas experienced no white flight at all? Large chunks of Detroit were still over 98% white in 1970, and even in 1980 there were 15 census tracts in Detroit that were over 95% white.
-How come white flight was just about as intense in the 60s as in the 70s when the 60s only includes 3 years that are post-1967?
It seems to me like white flight was already underway in several neighbourhoods before 1967, and it probably would have spread to other parts of Detroit without the riots, although the riots might have helped speed things up a little.